Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Systems Accounting Software Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Open_Systems_Accounting_Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) →TheSpecialUser^Talk_{Contributions}* 05:33, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Open Systems Accounting Software

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't find any RS, the listed refs seem self-published sources. mabdul 19:42, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep and Close - Try exploring some of the links in the Google News header of this AfD. It's sort of backwards to state that one cannot find sources, propose the article for deletion, and then afterward the Google News link in the deletion discussion provides the results that couldn't be "found". Please strongly consider using Google News prior to nominating articles for deletion here. Read also in entirety WP:BEFORE. Also, very importantly, please remember that per WP:NRVE, ..."The absence of citations in an article (as distinct from the non-existence of sources) does not indicate that the subject is not notable." Keep per:

Rahman, A. Shukor (November 1, 1993). "Low-end Accounting Package for SMEs". New Straits Times. Retrieved May 13, 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
Garner, Rochelle (September 17, 2004). "Small Fry Open Systems Earns Big Channel Points". CRN News. Retrieved May 13, 2012.
Fineberg, Seth (April 4, 2004). "Open Systems Still Stands the Test of Time". Accounting Today.

—Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:20, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:29, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the Accounting Today articles is acceptable to indicate notability DGG ( talk ) 04:27, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There is also [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], and sources provided by NorthAmerica. SL93 (talk) 20:24, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.