- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:39, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Nova Ray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable: a company with one main product, providing insufficient evidence of notability other than the existence of a company website, evidence for patents, and a link to one old comparison site. Klbrain (talk) 22:48, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This page was nominated for deletion 5 years ago, but the nomination was never completed (step 3 missing), and there was no debate. Since then, the page has been very quiet, with no improved despite being tagged. I've tried to tidy it up, but most of the existing links have vanished and hence the material is unsupported. I've checked the company website, and there are no News articles since 2006 and the 'contact' page is broken. Klbrain (talk) 23:02, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's also an orphan. Klbrain (talk) 08:03, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.