Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neural Lab Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Neural_Lab

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neural Lab (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability. This page appears to be an advertisement/blog for Neural Lab, it lacks any sources that refer to Neural Lab. I could not find any reputable source that mentions this software. The talk page is filled with accounts that appear to be sockpuppets created for the sole purpose of promoting the software. Chemeez (talk) 14:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 August 6. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:11, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science, Technology, Computing, Internet, and Software. — Karnataka ^talk 16:40, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No evidence that this meets WP:GNG or WP:NSOFTWARE. As the nominator says, the books listed in the reference section don't appear to actually mention this software, unsurprising, since it seems the books were published before the software was released. - MrOllie (talk) 22:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete' as article about a subject failing WP:GNG and WP:NSOFTWARE. Note that Talk:Neural Lab has a few users commenting that they used this software, but these users never made any other edits at all. It's impossible to say conclusively, but a bunch of users making a single edit each looks a lot like socks. Anton.bersh (talk) 20:51, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.