Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Network Animation Editor Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Network_Animation_Editor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - TP 03:44, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Network Animation Editor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an instruction manual for product. WP:NOT Greenmaven (talk) 09:38, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This does not appear to be notable, and even if it was, the article is, as was stated, more of an instruction manual. Wikipedia articles should not contain the phrase "search Google for ..." Also dos not pass criteria in WP:NOTADVERTISING Millermk90 (talk) 02:05, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete based upon Jack Greenmaven's nomination explanation. Folgertat (talk) 22:03, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.