Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nature and Psychological wellbeing chapter overview transcript Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nature_and_Psychological_wellbeing_chapter_overview_transcript

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. CSD G7 v/r - T P 16:43, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nature and Psychological wellbeing chapter overview transcript

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined PROD. The content is a transcript of a video detailing some textbook chapter, but there is no assertion of notability of this particular textbook chapter. Furthermore, the author responded to the PROD with the following:

This page has been created for an assignment which requires a transcript to be available online. I need this to be available until december then it will be removed. Please leave it up until then and I will delete it once it has been marked. Thank you.

Sorry, but Wikipedia is not a web host. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 04:57, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unacceptable in so many ways it's not even funny. Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 05:02, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—I read the speedy criteria in vain. I hesitate to propose new speedy deletion criteria, but there ought to be one for things like this.— alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 05:26, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article creator said they need the transcript to be available online; they didn't say it needed to be available on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a free web host. I recommend finding somewhere else to store this transcript, because it's not an encyclopedia article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:25, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (Should be Speedy as it absolutely doesn't belong here). Not encyclopedic in any way, and not even intended to be. When Fitzroy Maclean became an MP so he could resign from the civil service to join up as a soldier, Churchill said 'this is the man who uses the Mother of Parliaments as a public convenience'. Well, the author here is using Wikipedia as just that. Extraordinary. Fails WP:NOT. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:37, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, and suggest WP:SNOW closure. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:01, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete immediately - Wikipedia is not a webhost. --Madison-chan (talk) 20:52, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Madison-chan[reply]

Speedy Delete Jethwarp (talk) 04:40, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not encyclopedic. I'd suggest salting this to ensure that the user doesn't re-add it, but I'm going to try to assume good faith that the editor won't attempt this. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:25, 15 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]

QUICK DELETE IT Noodles&Wedges (talk) 08:55, 15 November 2011 (UTC)sure i made a mistake so go and delete it. I tried but it wouldn't let me. I'm so sorry for getting it all wrong. Noodles&Wedges (talk) 08:55, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.