Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nanoinformatics Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nanoinformatics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete G12 (non-admin closure) Withdrawn by nominator. Harsh (talk) 14:48, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nanoinformatics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete or Merge to Nanotechnology or Nanomedicine. Deleting seems appropriate because maybe there isn't anything worth keeping. However, if significant content is added then obviously should be saved. A nanotech expert maybe helpful here. Harsh (talk) 13:25, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:22, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is it me or is the one paragraph in it a word for word copy from the website? Delete, quite possibly Speedy Delete as G12. MM ("Well? What have you got to report?") ^{("My new invention!")} 14:26, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I apologise for wasting the time. Its a copyvio G12. Harsh (talk) 14:48, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.