Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myriagonal number Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Myriagonal_number

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Polygonal number. Michig (talk) 09:38, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Myriagonal number (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete or Redirect to Polygonal number:No sources supporting notability except OEIS since May 2011. See also Wikipedia:Notability/Noticeboard/Archive 5#Is Myriagonal number notable at all? Inspector (talk) 08:11, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Polygonal number Except for a single code snippet and the entry in OEIS, I could find no mention of myriagonal numbers independent of Wikipedia. There is not enough notability for a standalone article, but the concept is verifiable. I've added myriagonal numbers to the Table of values in the Polygonal number article for the potential redirect. Mark viking (talk) 17:05, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per Mark viking. הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 21:13, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or redirect per WP:NUMBER. There are an infinite number of different kinds of polygons, and therefore an infinite number of different sequences of polygonal numbers; we can only keep a small finite number of the interesting ones, and this isn't one of them. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:08, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per David Eppstein, with the caveat that for interesting we should read notable, otherwise the smallest uninteresting number would be interesting enough to merit an article. In passing, "Myriagonal" and "Myriagon" are unknown to ZMATH. Deltahedron (talk) 07:27, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.