Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multiphysics Methods Group Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Multiphysics_Methods_Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Idaho National Laboratory. MBisanz ^talk 05:20, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Multiphysics Methods Group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A small group of 11 people. Article started by an editor working only on the Idaho National Lab and its programs. It is adequately discussed with a single sentence in the main article, and the name is not distinctive enough for a redirect. DGG ( talk ) 21:22, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Vacation^nine 22:22, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.T R 09:53, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Idaho National Laboratory. Not much coverage outside institutional/government press releases and academic papers by staff. Redirects are cheap, and "not distinctive enough" is a poor argument against a redirect - are people less likely to search for it because it's not a very exciting name? There's lots of very mundane redirects on Wikipedia. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:58, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above. Topics without independent notability can still be discussed within the context of another article. -- Whpq (talk) 17:05, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect per Colapeninsula and Whpq. Deltahedron (talk) 07:18, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.