Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multigraph (software) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Multigraph_(software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Multigraph (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable software. —Theopolisme 16:58, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Searching for references for the software is a bit challenging, because there is already a Multigraph commercial software product for visualizing multi-channel data acquisition experiments; the Google Scholar articles I saw referenced this software. Regarding the Javascript library, I could find no published papers. There are a couple of abstracts "Multigraph: Interactive Data Graphs on the Web". Bibcode:2010AGUFMED43B..05P. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help) "Multigraph: Reusable Interactive Data Graphs". Bibcode:2010AGUFMIN31C..08P. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help) from the 2010 American Geophysical Union meeting, but it is unclear if this meeting has peer-reviewed submissions. Given the lack of peer-reviewed sources, this may be a case of WP:TOOSOON. When peer-reviewed sources and reviews are published, recreation of the article is reasonable. Mark viking (talk) 20:31, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 05:35, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:31, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This Article is barely even a stub. Deleting it hardly removes anything. If a longer new Article can be written that somehow proves notability, so be it, but even so getting rid of this stub is a good idea. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 04:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.