Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morphological computation (robotics) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Morphological_computation_(robotics)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Morphological computation (robotics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The main issues are listed in Talk:Morphological_computation_(robotics) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kakila (talk • contribs) 15:28, 7 December 2011‎ (UTC)[reply]

This discussion was not properly transcluded. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 22:49, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Speedy close and invite Kakila (talk · contribs) to have another go at nominating it. --Northernhenge (talk) 00:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC) Fixed already Northernhenge (talk) 00:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I read the whole article carefully. Despite being technical sounding, it is a lot of vague hype and nothingness. It does nothing to either detail or explain the supposed topic. The references are very limited, the most prevalent author is the very person being promoted in the article. The newest reference is 5 years old. North8000 (talk) 00:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOR. Bearian (talk) 21:10, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.