Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MoonScript Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/MoonScript

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lua (programming language)#Languages that compile to Lua. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 21:56, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MoonScript

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet GNG or NSOFTWARE. Sources in the article are not WP:IS. Before did not reveal any sources that provide SIGCOV directly and in-depth, even at the lower standard for open source. StackOverflow showed 122 results over 5.5 years most with one or no answers.

I was going to AfD the article but decided to try redirecting it to Lua (programming language), but the redirect was objected to and reverted. It could be considered an ambiguous search term, so it might be better to delete. // Timothy :: talk 07:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 07:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Lua_(programming_language)#Languages_that_compile_to_Lua where it is mentioned. I was unable to find multiple in-depth, independent reliable sources discussing Moonscript, so agree it fails the notability threshold. But basic facts are verifiable and the brief mention in the Lua article seems of due weight. This is a plausible search term and I don't see ambiguity as a problem, as MoonScript is the programming language and Moon script is the Braille alternative. Hence, redirect. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 08:36, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.