Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modilo Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Modilo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 19:45, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Modilo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nomination on behalf of NexCarnifex (talk · contribs) (see this). I declined a prod added by that user earlier; on further investigation, the additional coverage I found was minimal and unhelpful. NexCarnifex has stated that the subject of this article is not notable and that the sources included do not help establish notability. I am neutral in this AfD. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 00:39, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. --hydrox (talk) 03:39, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no significant coverage. --Nuujinn (talk) 13:04, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ... I'm new at this, so I'm not sure if this is the way to do this ... but My concern is the article on > modilo < that we have submitted. We do not understand why it is "suggested for deletion" or why it would not qualify, as it is a legitimate company with references AND is "notable" in that it definately IS one of the first (if not The First) nordic companies to implement <position awareness> in ERP / business oriented applications... which is definately significant IMHO K-S Sirkka User:K272479 User_talk:K272479

If you can add legitimate references that clearly indicate it's notability, the tag will be removed. But the references there certainly do not indicate it.NexCarnifex (talk) 00:50, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment, I've copied the above from Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Modilo, since the comment was misplaced. --Nuujinn (talk) 14:31, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as spam. nothing about this company in gnews [1]. LibStar (talk) 07:14, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so "indicating that it is Notable" would be what ... newspaper articles ?

Since this is a Nordic company, it's not surprising there is no mention in gnews. As I said earlier, I'm new to this, so excuse a stupid question ... should this article about modilo perhaps be only in the Swedish/Finnish version of Wikipedia ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by K272479 (talk • contribs) 07:16, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

K272479 —Preceding unsigned comment added by K272479 (talk • contribs) 07:12, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And one more thing ... I hope You are aware of what <position aware> solutions are about, and that this is The Hottest area of smartphone and web-applikations right noe ... and probably for the comming decade ! As the artiucle states modilo is in the forefront of this revolution in ERP & business applications, which in it self should be "notable" IMHO

k272479

• Comment, there's no reason it cannot be here as long as reliable sources provide coverage. Newspaper or magazine articles about the company itself are fine, but if they are in Swedish/Finnish, please provide a translation on the article's talk page. Also, please sign your posts with four tildes. Let us know if you have additional questions. --Nuujinn (talk) 13:10, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK ... Thanks for your patience with my questions and your suggestions. We'll try finding a couple of article references and provide translations of atleast part of them

--kss (talk) 12:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC)--kss (talk) 12:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.