Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ModEdit Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ModEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:42, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ModEdit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is not built from reliable secondary sources; no assertion of notability. Prod was contested - no further explaination than "remove prod, notable software" - but that editor is currently blocked. Marasmusine (talk) 19:35, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 22:00, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.