Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mischa Rick van Geelen Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mischa_Rick_van_Geelen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:57, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mischa Rick van Geelen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This "white hat hacker" has some sources in Dutch, but IPs can't seem to bear the article's existence, templating it for CSD several times. To solve the consensus, I'm bringing the debate here. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:40, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Being mentioned a couple times, even by perhaps reliable sources, isn't the same thing as general notability, and I feel inclined to think that the article should just be deleted. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 22:42, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now and draft and userfy if needed as I'm not finding much better. SwisterTwister talk 05:35, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to satisfy WP:GNG, and the mentions don't appear to satisfy WP:BASIC. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:19, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.