Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MicroScript programming language Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/MicroScript_programming_language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to TRON project. we have to decide somehow. Merge seems a reasonable option DGG ( talk ) 23:02, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MicroScript programming language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Wikipedia is not a directory of programming languages. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:22, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No sources or information found on Google search. A programming language used by a small number of people, hence not notable enough per [WP:N]]. TYelliot (talk) 21:55, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Considering that this is part of the TRON project, it is possible that it is of some significance in the context of TRON. Therefore it may be desirable to merge this somewhere. I would suggest where, except that I know very little about TRON. I think someone with more extensive knowldege of the topic should comment on the appropriate course of action. Rilak (talk) 07:04, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this debate, as well as several others I have begun on marginal or non-notable computer science topics, is listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing, so whatever experts we may have around should be aware of it. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:56, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would not have any faith into the competentcy of WikiProject Computing since all they ever seem do is slap own tags on articles and mark fundamental topics in computer architecture as being of low importance. And this is when they have an active editor or two. Rilak (talk) 01:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 00:12, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jujutacular ^talk 02:17, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to TRON Project. Not finding anything in the article or elsewhere that shows notability, although IANAP. TRON Project itself is a short article and has plenty of space for this material as a separate section, and people reading the TRON Project article might want this information. Herostratus (talk) 18:04, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.