Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Managed Memory Computing Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Managed_Memory_Computing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:09, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managed Memory Computing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, fails WP:GNG. Quasar G ^{t - c} 11:23, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nominator. ♫ RichardWeiss talk contribs 11:53, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This looks to be a particular company's sales name for Database caching. - MrOllie (talk) 13:11, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not a prevalent term. Appears to be a specific companies jargon/solution. Knox490 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:14, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- falls very far short of the bar for WP:CORPDEPTH. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 15:33, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Managed Memory Computing seems to be a proprietary technology used by ElegantJ BI, a business intelligence tool, also at AdD. I think neither meets WP:GNG as I can not find coverage of either of them in independent reliable sources. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:40, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as per above.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 23:58, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The capital letters made me think this might be the name of a company, but it is just the usual attempt to make some marketing term sound more grandiose by using capital letters. The company also up for deletion is ElegantJ BI, edited by the same single-purpose accounts. W Nowicki (talk) 20:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.