Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mail Markup Language Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mail_Markup_Language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 11:00, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mail Markup Language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reasonable claim to notability; the article, its cited sources, and most Google results are written by the product's non-notable inventor. CoJaBo (talk) 23:40, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I see no coverage about this in reliable sources. the article even states that the author of MML is considering submitting it to the IETF, but hasn't done so yet. This is way premature for an article. -- Whpq (talk) 15:44, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non-notable, I can't find any reliable sources. --Nuujinn (talk) 23:58, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Darkwind (talk) 04:43, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.