Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loser Man Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Loser_Man

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:22, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Loser Man (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

text is pretty much entirely unintelligible, as far as I can tell from the "sources" it's a neologism based on the fact a girl on a tv show called short men losers Jac16888 ^Talk 13:34, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Unintelligible ramblings about so-called "internet jargon" that is really a widely-accepted term. Brambleberry of RiverClan ^{Chat ♠ Watch} 16:30, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Great example of how a well-referenced article can still be junk. --BDD (talk) 16:36, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - completely unintelligible, probably not notable. CodeTheorist (talk) 22:02, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NEO This is almost nonsensical. --Artene50 (talk) 00:01, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep this existence to Englich language source -- 211.50.11.114 (talk) 06:22, 23 June 2012 (UTC) — 211.50.11.114 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 00:56, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 00:56, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Incomprehensible. Famous_dog (c) 13:07, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• keep that is reference data of englich language, help upgrade it's documents. -- Almust (talk) 13:38, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• • Internet Hot Over Misuda Guest’s Loser Remark koreatimes 2009-11-12 (in English)
  • Latest ‘Misuda’ Internet Controversy asian, Nov 11, 2009 (in English)
  • `Loser` girl in hot water koreaherald 2010-03-30 (in English)
  • My Seoul Called Life:How to Become A Social Outcast (in English)
  • Korean girl calls you a loser! koreainsider 2010.01.16 (in English)
  • How Misuda’s ‘loser girl’ lost her privacy asian, Sep 10, 2010 (in English)
  • Insecurity makes headlines again as short men are called "losers" on "Misuda."
  • http://news.search.naver.com/search.naver?sm=tab_hty.top&where=news&ie=utf8&query=%EB%AF%B8%EC%88%98%EB%8B%A4+%EB%A3%A8%EC%A0%80

and addition attachments of it's Korean Language Newspapers link. thank you. -- Almust (talk) 19:22, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.