Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LiveRebel Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/LiveRebel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 08:48, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

LiveRebel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable software product which fails WP:NOTABILITY. Article was created by an WP:SPA advertising-only account as a part of a long history of Spam and promotion on Wikipedia. see Spam Case. Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article.

I am also nominating the following related Spam campaign page:

Hu12 (talk) 00:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nom. Toddst1 (talk) 03:58, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - software article lacking 3rd party references to establish notability; created by an SPA as promotional, per nom. Dialectric (talk) 08:56, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 20:12, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.