Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Windows bugcheck codes Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Windows_bugcheck_codes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Transwiki, if Wikibooks wants it, otherwise delete. (I'll go ask the WB people if they want it). Courcelles 23:59, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Windows bugcheck codes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pointless list of no encyclopaedic value. Fails WP:NOT andy (talk) 14:11, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a programmer's manual. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:22, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:24, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• 0xDEADDEAD. Wikibooks would probably be a better fit for a manual page like this. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:24, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Transwiki to wikibooks per Ihcoyc. Looks useful, just not encyclopedic. Several Times (talk) 15:23, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.