Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nintendo codenames Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Nintendo_codenames

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:56, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Nintendo codenames

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This stand-alone list fails WP:LISTN. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 23:32, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:40, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:40, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it's basically a whole article based around WP:TRIVIA and WP:GAMECRUFT. The code names of Nintendo consoles are largely inconsequential and fade into irrelevance once they announce the final product names. I almost nominated it for deletion myself when I tagged it for notability earlier in the month. 00:14, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Sergecross73 msg me
Delete per nominator. Trivial non-notable list. WP:GAMECRUFT. Ajf773 (talk) 01:35, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unnecessary and WP:SYNTH; fails to prove WP:N. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 11:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Most of this list is probably just made up, and even if it were true, it doesn't need an article about it. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 04:13, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Trivial list. Full of original research. --The1337gamer (talk) 23:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:LISTN.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.