Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libra (software) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Libra_(software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:39, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Libra (software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet Wikipedia notability requirements. Sure, there are tons of other apps called "Libra", for which you can find a smidgen of coverage, but not for this one. (This app never reached the 1.0 milestone.) Codename Lisa (talk) 14:51, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Flow 234 (Nina) talk 22:10, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Flow 234 (Nina) talk 22:10, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Non-notable software per WP:N. SL93 (talk) 02:37, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete per nom -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 04:17, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Of course just being discontinued is not a reason to delete, but this never seemed to be notable to begin with. Just another victim of the 2008 bubble bursting, not lasting long enough to meet notability thresholds. W Nowicki (talk) 20:31, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.