Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LeetCode Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/LeetCode

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:12, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LeetCode

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

New non-notable; no references available to suport notability. Only refs on article are low-quality Quora or Blog refs. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 17:06, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:28, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:28, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:28, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, SPA. –Be..anyone 💩 09:49, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as my searches are simply not finding anything else better. SwisterTwister talk 04:33, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - web site article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in independent RS references. Refs provided are incidental mentions, non-RS sources, and a student newspaper. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 13:59, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.