Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Shi-min (2nd nomination) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lee_Shi-min_(2nd_nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Philg88 ^♦talk 10:51, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Shi-min

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable artist. Suspected case of self-promotion. The only reliable-sounding source found for this subject during a Google Search is the "Museum of Contemporary Art, Asia", which turned out to be a nonexistent museum which appears to be connected with the artist. Therefore, I have also listed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Museum of Contemporary Art, Asia, apparently created by the same group of sockpuppets. The Lee Shi-min article was previously listed for deletion in 2008, but the result was "Keep" even though the majority of the "keep" votes came from single-purpose accounts which are obvious sockpuppets: User:KWongtawan, User:Bream1, User:Kreisler, possibly associated with the banned User:Abd. Other probable sockpuppets include User:Toraya and User:Kirovsky. I also need to list March of the Dolls for deletion, also a non-notable subject associated with this guy...all in all, a big web of sockpuppets and self-promotion to sift through. Thanks, Citobun (talk) 10:09, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for reasons given by nominator and reasons I myself gave back in 2008. --Nlu (talk) 12:46, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete looks like a hoax, just like the associated "museum" article. -Zanhe (talk) 03:52, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A7 at best, G3 at worst.--180.172.239.231 (talk) 00:40, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.