Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Language Axiological Input/Output Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Language_Axiological_Input/Output

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 12:00, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Language Axiological Input/Output

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not see how the article is notable. This may be great technology developed by very respectable people, but it was only published earlier this year (plus there are two references from 2011), there is no evidence in the article that the technology was noticed by anybody but the authors, and I was not able to locate such evidence myself. May be it becomes a great technology much in demand in a couple of years, and then the article will be recreated. As it is now, it is just a scientific article, one of dozens of thousands published every year. Ymblanter (talk) 08:11, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I could find no evidence that this newly-described technique has become mainstream or has caused any particular notice in the field. The single article in which it was published has only been cited by others twice, per Google Scholar, and there has been no publicity at all in popular media. Maybe a case of WP:TOOSOON. --MelanieN (talk) 17:20, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.