Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Landscape design for educational function Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Landscape_design_for_educational_function

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:54, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Landscape design for educational function

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, tagged as such since 2015. Fails WP:NOTPROMO, more specifically point #5. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 07:32, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete unsourced essay that fails to inspire any confidence that it is a real thing. Mangoe (talk) 12:53, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:18, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:18, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Mangoe, as an attempted essay. Where there any valid points, the editor could try to add them to Landscape architecture. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.