Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LSSP (linear algebra library) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/LSSP_(linear_algebra_library)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:57, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LSSP (linear algebra library)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. No refs and a search turns up nothing. Not that this is a formal criterion, but a Github project with a single maintainer and no other participants suggests it is largely unknown and unused. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 04:43, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it stands though I'm willing to be convinced otherwise - David Gerard (talk) 11:43, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I initially tagged this for speedy deletion as a copyvio and promotional. The article is mostly a copy of the github page. To me, the fact that author links the first words of the article to the page is evidence of promotion -- the article was written not because of notability but as an advertisement for the software, and we are to have every detail on it and every possibility of reaching it, with no concern for explaining why the software is notable. Wikipedia is not a directory of software libraries, but that is how this article is using it. ubiquity (talk) 13:17, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nothing establishing both independent notability and substance. SwisterTwister talk 03:25, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.