Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koding Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Koding

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. MBisanz ^talk 03:41, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Koding (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly non notable. From the style of writing to references like Crunchbase, angel.co profile.. nothing but a SEO promoting article. Light2021 (talk) 06:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:54, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not notable enough. Ashishkafle (talk) 14:31, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.