Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KnowledgeTree Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/KnowledgeTree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. [1] (non-admin closure) — neuro^(talk) 23:30, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

KnowledgeTree (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable and lack of verifiable and reliable sources 16x9 (talk) 20:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. There are reliable sources about this one; there's an article on it on novell.com already linked in the article; there are multiple feature articles on linux.com[2][3] and a refereed conference paper describing its approach.[4]

• Comment Ooops I missed those. About to withdrawal my AfD and add them to the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 16x9 (talk • contribs) 23:19, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.