Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keyword Tool Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Keyword_Tool

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A Train^talk 07:49, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keyword Tool

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't strictly fall within any of the CSD categories, but it's entirely non-notable software. agtx 17:37, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 19:00, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 19:00, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I scaled through the references and the topic as well. I guess this passes Wikipedia:GNG.Slovnimbom (talk) 07:24, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:50, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete relatively trivial software. Essentially all the articles listed just include it as one possibility among many others. That's not substantial coverage. DGG ( talk ) 18:26, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note this is undisclosed paid editing by socks and most likely qualifies for CSD G5: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Japanelemu. SmartSE (talk) 09:50, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.