Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaya (programming language) (2nd nomination) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kaya_(programming_language)_(2nd_nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kaya (programming language)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails General Notability Guideline, WP:NSOFT. Unable to find any sources. ― Padenton|✉ 08:29, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It has been tagged for its notability problem for a year now. And it has been deleted last time too. Per WP:BURDEN, the author must have not made it. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 10:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software (programming language) article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant RS coverage of this software. Previously deleted in 2013 at afd.Dialectric (talk) 01:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, 2011, not yet ready for prime time or dead, nothing on the 1st google scholar page for kaya is about a programming language. –Be..anyone (talk) 11:54, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.