Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joint Marine Modelling Programme Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Joint_Marine_Modelling_Programme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:10, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Joint Marine Modelling Programme

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references provided and I can find no Google hits for it. Derek Andrews (talk) 14:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC) Derek Andrews (talk) 14:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 14:52, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 14:52, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 14:52, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no sources.Icewhiz (talk) 15:14, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - trivial and no independent WP:RS sources. Kierzek (talk) 16:55, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect I added a source. Redirect to Joint Weather and Climate Research Programme if someone (maybe me!) has created it by the time the AfD closes. Otherwise delete but allow the redirect upon request.--Pontificalibus (talk) 07:26, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:07, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:07, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.