Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacek Tylicki Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jacek_Tylicki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tyrenius 17:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jacek Tylicki

Originally a proposed deletion. No real claim to notability, no references or other indicators of notability. freshacconcispeaktome 14:59, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. —freshacconcispeaktome 15:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per freshacconci. Thus far the article is strong on philosophy and description of work, with no references or clear evidence of notability. Claims of founding a 'natural art' movement need substantiation to establish validity and importance. JNW (talk) 15:53, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Could be saved with references. Looks like it might be an autobio (looking through the history, you see one of the old editors User:Jacek1981). Malinaccier (talk • contribs) 18:07, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 21:29, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per freshacconcispeaktome and above. - Modernist (talk) 23:22, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The article is hopeless, but even this doesn't spell notability to me. Johnbod (talk) 02:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.