Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JUMP - Java Metamodel Protocol Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/JUMP_-_Java_Metamodel_Protocol

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BJ^Talk 04:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

JUMP - Java Metamodel Protocol (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No external references given, no assertion of notability, tags removed without addressing issues. Please prove to me this isn't an ad for a pet project, and I'll withdraw my deletion nomination. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- VG ☎ 17:26, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I can't find anything in reliable, third-party sources. The article seems a promotional puff piece. See [1]. VG ☎ 17:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Jumper is a new and innovative experiment in extending the Semantic Web to structured data. It has been derived the Relational.OWL schema and offers significant extensions for profiling data. It is commercially used as an enterprise-wide information management and, ultimately, semantic interoperability framework. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.245.32.210 (talk) 20:48, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • It may be so new that we can't verify if any of it is true. Wikipedia doesn't lead in presenting new technology, we follow what reliable sources report is leading new technology. If sources besides the company/website itself don't exist then we can't verify it's notable enough to be included. Perhaps soon it will but not yet. -- Banjeboi 20:52, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. per VG. -- Banjeboi 20:50, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per WP:RS.  Asenine  15:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete due to the lack of citations from reliable sources which are a requirement of the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 15:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.