Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iteration of mathematical curves Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Iteration_of_mathematical_curves

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 17:03, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Iteration of mathematical curves (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A howto type article which duplicates material and contains some original research Salix (talk): 21:00, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:04, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• delete potentially useful on some other project maybe (after a lot of work), but not an encyclopaedic topic or article, per WP:NOTHOWTO.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 23:49, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Any worthwhile material already exists in Polar coordinate system, etc. -- 202.124.73.16 (talk) 01:30, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• delete appears to consist entirely of original research.linas (talk) 17:26, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• delete - seems to be author's notes of their explorations with a parametric curve plotting package - original research, poorly written, not encyclopedic. Gandalf61 (talk) 08:46, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Condtional delete - if someone with expertise on the topic could fix it, I would be happier keeping this than a deletion, because the concept or idea appears to be notable. However, it is such a mess of a synthesis that it is unencyclopedic as written. Bearian (talk) 17:22, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.