Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IssueNet Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/IssueNet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:09, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IssueNet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet any notability guidelines. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:21, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: indeed does not. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 13:38, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete software article of unclear notability, lacking significant RS coverage. Refs provided are all press releases or incidental mentions/minor awards; the Triangle Business Journal ref is a possible exception, but at one brief paragraph, which does not even mention 'IssueNet', does not establish notability.Dialectric (talk) 12:40, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.