Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IntraWeb VCL Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/IntraWeb_VCL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 09:23, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IntraWeb VCL

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this is notable. At least article can not show that. –ebraminio^talk 09:05, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - insufficient references to establish notability for this software; created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 12:57, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: my search revealed no significant coverage in reliable sources independent of topic. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 13:22, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.