Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interoperable PDK Libraries (2nd nomination) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Interoperable_PDK_Libraries_(2nd_nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 10:35, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interoperable PDK Libraries (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

2008 no consensus shortly after launch. But other than run of the mill announcements following its launch, there is nothing to indicate ORG compliant sourcing. URL is dead, which makes me think alliance is no longer, and never established notability while it existed. Star Mississippi 13:27, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Computing. Star Mississippi 13:27, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Courtesy ping to those still active from prior AfD: @Narutolovehinata5, Fabrictramp, and Malinaccier: Star Mississippi 13:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It appeared around the founding there was substantial coverage, but I can't find much now to establish notability. As the nominator indicated, the links to the Reuters articles I found in 2008 don't work---I'm sure I could find archived versions, but the fact that there has not been continued coverage makes the old coverage somewhat irrelevant. Malinaccier (talk) 01:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:51, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - article is promotional in nature and there are no significant sources demonstrating that notability guidelines are met. MaxnaCarter (talk) 06:32, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.