Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Journal of Engineering Development and Research Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/International_Journal_of_Engineering_Development_and_Research

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 06:07, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

International Journal of Engineering Development and Research

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. (Note that the "impact factors" listed on the journal's website and that were mentioned in the article are fake, journal is not listed in any Thomson Reuters database and hence has no impact factor). Randykitty (talk) 11:06, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Says it "will provide" yet fails to have provided anything whatsoever. Non-notable, might be faked overall as per nom and additional research the panda ₯’ 12:26, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 17:33, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete another case of 'might be notable someday'. Definitely not today though and unlikely anytime very soon. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:57, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - borderline promotional. Deb (talk) 10:28, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.