Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intercepter (software) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Intercepter_(software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 01:20, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Intercepter (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable software. No discussion of importance found anywhere, a couple of reviews from geekshops but no significance asserted. fails Wikipedia:Notability (software). Earlier version CSD'd yesterday under Intercepter as promotional, since recreated as a redirect to Interceptor and subsequently modified to here ClubOranje^T 08:46, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

if you don't know other languages (russian at least) it doesn't mean that the program is not discussed or 'noted' on different sources. http://www.xakep.ru/magazine/xa/115/060/1.asp this magazine is very popular and is read by thousands ppl. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Intuserwiki (talk • contribs) 11:01, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:07, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources required by WP:GNG. The original Russian version of the article also lacks sources and Googling suggests that the necessary sources simply don't exist. Also, I note that the "features" section is an obvious cut-and-paste from the support site; WP is not for WP:PROMOTION. Msnicki (talk) 18:32, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Another non-notable software. SL93 (talk) 21:57, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.