Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integration Reference Point Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Integration_Reference_Point

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Integration Reference Point (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN technology standard. Little more than a dictdef. UtherSRG (talk) 13:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Computing. UtherSRG (talk) 13:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• delete per nom. Artem.G (talk) 07:35, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.