Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insync Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Insync

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:54, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Insync

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches have simply found nothing better at all than this so included searches at Books, browsers and WP:INDAFD found nothing better. Also nearly hints at speedy and PROD material since nothing is particularly surprisingly outstanding here including the awards which are simply expected at nearly any other article. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-notable. Tom29739 ^[talk] 17:32, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a non-notable company. The best (and perhaps only) references are [1] and [2], both of which are self published or questionable sources. No mention in any of the national newspapers in India. This fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.