Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institution of Analysts and Programmers Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Institution_of_Analysts_and_Programmers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:18, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Institution of Analysts and Programmers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is referenced, but all from the official website of the institution. For secondary coverage apart from routine linkedin the only mention of this organisation I can find is on the sponsor list of University of Sunderland here and a book by Barbee Davis on GB titled 97 Things Every Project Manager Should Know (of dubious notability). The article fails WP:GNG. The Legend of Zorro 15:00, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. The Legend of Zorro 15:02, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. The Legend of Zorro 15:02, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:19, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:20, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:21, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not appear to be notable. OSborn ^arf_contribs. 04:08, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:41, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 23:43, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.