Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Information processor Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Information_processor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:12, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information processor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

ill defined fgnievinski (talk) 19:34, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
related: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Order_(information_processing). fgnievinski (talk) 04:41, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:56, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge This subject may be notable, but does not need its own page. It would be more useful to include it in a more comprehensive, wider-scoped article. See WP:NOPAGE. BruceThomson (talk) 10:48, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The article title leaves you in doubt as to whether it's a person or a thing. This could be a dictionary definition, but that is one of things Wikipedia is WP:NOT. Jacona (talk) 12:25, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No evidence of notability. Merge would be undesirable as the bulk of the article explaining how information is conveyed by gravity appears to be original research. PaulT2022 (talk) 05:40, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.