Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infinite Computer Solutions (2nd nomination) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Infinite_Computer_Solutions_(2nd_nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 20:38, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infinite Computer Solutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable WP:SOLUTION article. Very light coverage of a routine nature fails WP:CORP. Bri (talk) 20:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Searches reveal significant coverage in the English-language Indian press. Searches should also be done in other Indian languages. A stock-exchange listed company with a global presence. AusLondonder (talk) 22:32, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Could you share some of the best sources? I found routine stock price and business function stuff like Infinite Computer Solutions Surges 5% on Buyback Nod (NDTV) and Infinite Computer Solutions (India) submits shareholding pattern (Live Mint). - Bri (talk) 01:23, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:PROMO with content such as:

• "...moved on to become the experts in Healthcare IT Solutions - for which the company has won several accolades and awards"

No encyclopedically relevant prose. If this company were notable (of which I'm not convinced), then I'm sure that a non-COI editor would come along and create an NPOV article. There's no rush to get to such a state, however. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:49, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.