Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inconsistent comparison Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Inconsistent_comparison

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:11, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inconsistent comparison (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find any source for this use of the term except what's already in the article, which is a WordPress blog. I found some logical fallacy listing sites containing different meanings of the term than what the article contains; I don't think they're RS either, though.

Seems like it might be WP:MADEUP. CharredShorthand (talk) 05:11, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:14, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. ℰmi1y_⧼T·C⧽ 10:58, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Also couldn't find any independent sources that relate to the concept, although I will note its a bit hard to look, these two words are used together in many places in ways not related to the topic, so if someone DOES find something feel free to ping me to re-evaluate. --WhoIs 127.0.0.1 ping/loopback 12:07, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This seems like a concept that should be covered in reliable sources (reminds me a bit of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retroactive nomenclature in that respect), but without such sources we can't have an article on it. It might be the case that the concept is covered by sources that use a different term for it, so ping me if something is found. TompaDompa (talk) 02:36, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Logic-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:36, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.