Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In-circuit functional tester Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/In-circuit_functional_tester

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:51, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In-circuit functional tester

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I considered prodding this, but I'm doing this instead as it's been here for so long. This is an unencyclopaedic essay full of original research. Adam9007 (talk) 02:41, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTESSAY. APerson (talk!) 04:30, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:41, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This would need extensive and thoughtful improvement and I'm not seeing any possibility of it with my searches finding nothing here, here and here. SwisterTwister talk 05:47, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.