Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IceFileSystem Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/IceFileSystem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:02, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IceFileSystem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No third-party sources in the article, and none that I found. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:40, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:18, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:18, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. Also unable to find sources. --Non-Dropframe _talk 19:43, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. An academic file system introduced in a paper in 2014 and cited in two papers in 2015. It is two soon to tell if it will have an impact on operating system research. StarryGrandma (talk)
• Delete as there's no better sourcing to suggest better aside from some browser links I found. SwisterTwister talk 06:57, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This just isn't really notable. An interested user could shift the contents into 'draft' form, I suppose. Otherwise, it ought to be deleted. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 02:12, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.