Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IT Service Integration Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/IT_Service_Integration

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IT Service Integration

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced dictionary definition. Perhaps someone can identify a merger target, but I can't see why this should be a standalone article. Biker Biker (talk) 17:24, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 02:41, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 02:41, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: refers to processes, tools and methods to establish a multi-supplier integration capability for an enterprise. The principle is in short to manage enterprise IT services delivered my multiple suppliers across different delivery models in one integrated enterprise service management process... Follows this with a list of items written in similar language, perfect for somebody's Power Point presentation. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 22:53, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Surprise! Companies use services and products from multiple sources and must integrate them together! Dictionary definition of jargon speak. OSborn^arf_contribs. 21:52, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as jargon and unreferenced dictionary definition (or userfy if the creator insists). Unattributed content like this is no help. No references, so no need to merge. --Pnm (talk) 20:23, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.