Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humane Informatics Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Humane_Informatics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:43, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Humane Informatics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No such thing. A catchy term for a nonnotable "a one-man project" Staszek Lem (talk) 18:36, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:51, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:51, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Wikipedia does not publish original research. Bearian (talk) 18:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG no "Significant coverage", the subject of the Humane Informatics article takes some real digging deep into search results to find almost all of which reference something else. The existing references only mention it in conjunction with a pair of products released nearly a decade ago. Coverage must be WP:SUSTAINED, and the subject's own website hasn't been updated in more than 7 years. [1] 2604:2000:8FC0:4:617F:E9A7:AF1C:4546 (talk) 17:45, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.